Coinfeeds Daily → Bitcoin Dev Luke Dashjr Denies Adding Inscriptions To CVE List, Community Debates

Bitcoin Dev Luke Dashjr Denies Adding Inscriptions To CVE List, Community Debates

Published: Dec 12, 2023 | Last Updated: Mar 17, 2024
Howard Kane
Bitcoin and its arguable vulnerability
Image: Bitcoin and its arguable vulnerability

Community split over network implications as Bitcoin inscriptions are added to the NVD's CVE list, stirring controversy.

The Bitcoin community has been abuzz with a recent controversy involving the United States National Vulnerability Database's (NVD) Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CVE) list. The core of the debate revolves around the addition of Bitcoin inscriptions to the list, a move that has sparked discussions about the implications for the Bitcoin network.

Understanding the Controversy

Bitcoin inscriptions, which some users see as a form of network utilization, have been labeled by others as a potential vulnerability. This has led to their inclusion in the NVD's CVE list, which tracks security flaws. The controversy intensified when Bitcoin core developer Luke Dashjr, known for his critical views on the Ordinals protocol, was thought to be behind the addition of these inscriptions to the CVE list. Dashjr, however, has firmly denied any involvement in this action.

The Debate Over Bitcoin Inscriptions

The Bitcoin community is divided on the nature of Bitcoin inscriptions. On one side, there are those who consider these inscriptions as spam that congests the network, potentially leading to higher transaction costs and slower processing times. On the other side, proponents argue that inscriptions are an essential innovation that could drive the next major wave of adoption and revenue generation for Bitcoin.

Potential Impact on the Bitcoin Network

The inclusion of Bitcoin inscriptions in the CVE list has raised concerns about the potential impact on the network. Critics worry that as more inscriptions are added, they could lead to increased congestion, affecting transaction times and fees. This could have broader implications for the scalability and efficiency of the Bitcoin network, which is already a subject of ongoing debate within the cryptocurrency community.

Conclusion

The discussion around Bitcoin inscriptions and their classification as vulnerabilities is ongoing. While Luke Dashjr has distanced himself from the controversy, the community continues to grapple with the broader implications of these inscriptions. As the debate unfolds, it will be important to monitor the effects on network performance and the evolving perspectives within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Receive a Custom Newsletter for the Coins You Follow

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.